Puuuhhh ...
long I fiddled turn before I've published here. The film is in fact pretty hard!
moralist get a heart attack anyway, but more on that later. And write about a recession (the one hopefully still smile can) was a real challenge.
After judging what about the director Lars von Trier HOW TO READ, it must be quite a nerd, too. And if so can present a film freak a "horror movie" you already expect that no X-ter infusion of Jason, Freddy or Leatherface (and what a certain Michael Bay turns everything else through meat grinder) it achieves.
him I would somehow as disturbing, mystical, obscene, violent, oppressive, intelligent but above all, artistically demanding call psychological horror film. Got it ... no? Power, I also not nothing. But I think the film will indeed do just that. Uncertainty, confusion and many interpretations. Not easy to describe this hard foods.
Von Trier is, by his own admission, have processed this film personal problems. Only by knowing the Lord in heaven is what's taken place in his upper story ...
action
so succinctly how to do it, because I do not want too much away:
while a couple on Fucking (cool, I may Write here! Fuck, Fuck, Fuck ...) the little boy falls out the window and dies. They then suffered a nervous breakdown and becomes the soul wreck. He is a professional psychologist and his wife will help their synapses to clamp again. The two drive to a secluded cabin in the woods. The fact that she was there with her son on holiday, to help with the therapy. Everything is completely out of hand and ends in a maelstrom of sex and violence. Before anyone thinks I
would be stupid to advertise the names of the characters, I must clarify something. There are no names. There are only a couple. He and She. And if he and you are talking to each other they call each other you. So it is basically you and you naturally. The child is referred to only as He. Fortunately, it dies at the beginning, otherwise you get so mixed up!
However, I know that He is in fact Willam Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg called. But do not worry. It is not necessary to know how the characters are called. The film is in fact almost one dialogue between the two. Who loves so just pure action and endless dialogues can not get along, restore the correct reading now and anyway landed on the wrong blog.
criticism
The plot sounds simple. But the implementation is new and creates a really dark atmosphere. The depiction of sex and violence is explicit. Do not get me wrong, the movie is not porn imprints. I'll buy it from Trier well be that he only used it as an artistic style funds. But you see it a lot.
Right in the opening scene, one wonders: Was it really just a tail? All must Defoe and Gainsbourg fans disappoint me though. The scenes were "körpergedoubelt" and so is the Holy of Holies of the two well-but forever a mystery. Later we see genitals and how they are mutilated. Yes, you read correctly. I am surprised that I could buy the film in this version just like in the store. The FSC has yet otherwise the pants always full.
clarify Man, however, that the genito-shocker-share is very low. The story is also only from one couple. Thus the potential for such actions are anyway limited biologically. This, however, entirely to a nasty blow to the gut to . Put I do still hurt the eggs, when I think of a scene ...
These images are definitely not what makes the film so special. There are actors, dialogue, mood, camera angles, cuts and sounds. The lonely cabin in the woods since "Evil Dead" the first, it creates fear to spread. This is clearly in the staging, not at the hut and the forest itself
But what really is blatant in the bulb are the super-slow-motion scenes. And if you're thinking that in these scenes really great and slowly looks like someone is dismembered, is on the wrong track completely!
The film is not a SAW in slow motion. Only the animals that he encountered in the woods to see in slow motion from a little worse for wear. In these scenes you will usually nothing more than images of the dark forest, while the woman walks through. But things slowly so extreme that it looks like a painting. For this, the voices of the couple. Even the prologue consists only of slow motion, accompanied by classical music. The skin purely real. Some like the boring but I call it art. And no, I was not on LSD when I saw this movie! Even though the film may very well be called a horror trip.
The world of film critics do not even really know what to make of the strip. He is highly praised by some and the rest torn. As hostile to women it is sometimes known. As hostile to women? Why that, please? Just because you mutated into a psychopathic fury? Willam Dafoe exception, not the one time, the animal has its role to one of the swatter? Because most of the violence emanating from it? Or because it looks like sex scenes? Probably say the same moral standards and would-be feminists are also firmly believe that all porn actresses are beaten to their job.
Conclusion
The funny elephant falls into this conclusion, because the director has clearly made an effort and created a little piece of art. When the credits I had the feeling I would grade myself a Hooks to the liver recover. This has packed up to now only Funny Games. The film is certainly not for everyone. But he determined his place will be found in the film books. has not yet, simply because there is something (I think) in the form. The assessment is not easy. One will evaluate it with 1 / 10, perhaps with the next 10/10. I've now seen him twice and will also be the third time something else to think about it than before. But only the records but actually already made a good movie.
I'll give you veeeery carefully a 7 / 10 (with upward trend), because he really is a matter of taste and am looking forward to your comments!
0 comments:
Post a Comment