Thursday, March 4, 2010

Gay Crusing Spots In Bombay

character tests - or about the nature of dogs and the people


This week we have another guest entry by the author and dog expert Clarissa von Reinhardt for you. More information can be found at www.animal-learn.de!

bee sting, scratch cats, horses to beat - and may this is known and accepted. Even young children teaches you to behave in these animals compared with cautious and prudent, not to frighten or provoke.

In dogs, everything is different. You may not defend themselves, should be up with everything, only they are "good dogs". In some places, they need a character test to be allowed to exist. In general, these tests are designed so that they can not be unfair. Power play with an animal that is entrusted to us as social partners.

Since the dog is lonely, separated from her caregiver, insecure and exposed to situations that frighten him. No normal person would something like an animal . Hurt He is provoked until he can no longer in his anxiety differently, to growl than or fight back - to say then that he growled and fought it has, what then of course again regarded as evidence that he is dangerous .

Since dogs by several people harassed, pushed and even stepped on the grounds that this could in a crowded elevator eventually happen again. It is threshed with sticks beside them on the floor, brandished it wildly until the dogs try to escape with wide, panicked eyes - which is prevented by a very short leash held. The more defensive the dog is, the more bold, the attempts to "lure from the reserve" it. Does he finally, after all unsuccessful attempts to flee into defensive behavior of, again this is proof that he is dangerous. If we were exposed to such situations, most would fail miserably from us. Would that be the proof of our good or bad character or our potential danger for our fellow man?

I have seen many videos of so-called character tests and, with few exceptions, I've seen absurd power games of sick people with defenseless animals. Usually people by the way, their knowledge of dogs so pathetic is that one wonders with what justification they think at all, this animal, of which they understand so obviously nothing to be able to test anything.

But there is something else. A whole society that does not protest. Hardly anyone dares to open his mouth. Shrug. Sentences like: "Is it all somehow dreadfully, but since you can just do nothing." Mute complicity.

When will the character test for men? Who protects the animals from us if we gefühlsarm, socially incompetent, brutish and dangerous? Considering quite a few contemporaries, one has the feeling that he is long overdue.

0 comments:

Post a Comment